Tax Incentives, 25C and 25E

Two new tax incentives were introduced by Senators Snowe and Bingaman earlier this month. The first, 25E, is a whole-home tax incentive that has been introduced in the Senate and which will use HERS ratings for qualifications. The second, the 25C tax incentive, will be an extension of the current tax code and it will provide incremental tax credits equivalent to the level of home energy improvement of the home.

Regarding the 25E tax credit, Efficiency First is concerned with the fact that the bill is not an extension of current efforts of home performance programs. The proposed approach for calculating savings deviates from the current national home performance program infrastructure. Using energy ratings to qualify tax credit recipients is problematic for a number of reasons. First, using HERS ratings creates an extra step and slows the process, resulting in a smaller closing rate. Second, communication between the raters and the contractors will be problematic and costly. Third, this procedure will diffuse responsibility for end results between the rater and the contractor.

Instead of using energy ratings, we suggest the alternative of using third party quality assurance, in line with the current process used by current national home performance programs. We support the performance approach, also known as Home Star, which uses delta simulation calibrated to actual bills. Efficiency First proposes five recommendations.

First, we suggest that the program requires the use of homeowner utility bills, and making before and after simulations of the home energy use. This will accurately reward energy savings.

Second, the primary beneficiary should be homes that have a more efficiency baseline, not homes that are most inefficient. This will assure maximum energy savings per tax credit dollar.

Third, those who do not pay taxes should not benefit from this tax incentive, but a different tax refund should be implemented specifically for this group.

Fourth, we encourage coordination with the DOE and the Vice President’s Recovery through Retrofit initiative in order to make this bill compatible with federal efforts for home energy efficiency.

Fifth, we recommend that a more simple system be implemented. The proposed legislation makes it so that the homeowner is not aware of whether he will receive the incentive until after the work was completed and paid for. Using the delta simulation approach will provide a measure of consumer protection.

The current 25C tax incentive will expire at the end of 2010, and the proposed extension of this legislation incorporates an inclusion of retrofit labor toward the credit. Efficiency First supports the inclusion of labor costs toward the tax credit. We further recommend to the EPA to allow weather-stripping and air sealing to qualify for the material costs and labor tax credits.

2 Comments

  1. Wayne Mackey says:

    I completely support a program that requires the use of a homeowner’s previous electric utility bills over a lookback period of at least two years. By going back two years minimum you get a clearer average that reflects weather changes over a broader perspective. These can easily be obtained directly from all electric utility suppliers. Just call them up and request the figures as I did back in 2007 when I first started my energy retrofit. Then put the data onto a spreadsheet and list each figure, such as killowatt hours used for each specific month of the year and the associated electric utility bill (cost) . This way, a homeowner can clearly see how effective each new energy efficiency improvement impacts both the usage and costs. This will perhaps help motivate the homeowner to do even more when they find out, as I did, that they do have a greater control over their energy bills than previously thought. I just completed a 5 year energy efficiency, and renewable energy project here in my home a few days ago. Back in 2005 we consumed a total of 25,781Kwh of Electricity for the year. Our 2010 total energy use is just 4,600Kwh. By making our home 65% more energy efficient than it was back in 2005, we realized in December 2009 that suddenly, renewable energy (solar PV and Solar Domestic Hot Water) could now contribute much of our home’s energy. We are now 82% more energy efficient than what we were back in 2005. This year alone we saved a total of $2,400 on electricity and we made an additional $1,800 on Renewable Energy Credits for a total of $4,200. Our out of pocket expenses for the PV and SDHW systems cost (after state and federal grants and rebbates, came to $21,500. projected payback is now estimated to be between 5-6 years. Then we will be able to use the extra annual savings to pay our property taxes and our other utility bills such as sewer, refuse and water.
    If anyone is interested in looking at my spreadsheets and 201 Final Report please feel free to e-mail me at dmwm5261@comcast.net.

  2. We actually want to update our present home and build a customized home but we’re not confident we will be capable to sell our existing house. Upgrading will definitely help make our current home more enjoyable while we are here. We will most likely add a bath room and remodel some things. Thanks for this post.

Leave a Reply